66%

23 May

They mustn’t be ‘big picture thinkers’

Even if festival organisers were giving away the oysters, there was still an element of pecuniary advantage, however indirect.

Given the ‘festival organisers‘ are a charitable trust doesn’t that alter the element of ‘pecuniary advantage‘?

Under customary fishing regulations ……. can be gatherings and tangi (funeral services) as long as they are not sold.

If I got some for a funeral, haven’t I obtained an ‘element of pecuniary advantage, however indirect.’  That has reduced the cost of the tangi catering considerably.  Haven’t I indirectly gained a pecuniary advantage?

”Because the festival is a commercial activity, using seafood gathered by customary authorisation for any activities within it [such as giveaways and prizes] falls within the definition of `sale for commercial activity’,” he said.

It was not possible to give customary authorisation ”because they charge people to go in” to the festival, she said.

I went, with the school, up to the Marae when the navy boat was visiting.  There was a spread of kaimoana there.  Was the Marae paid by council (or whomever the host was)?  If they were I hope they didn’t obtain anything under ‘customary rights’?

 

 

Nb: These are my personal comments because I have had NO involvement in this process at all.

Advertisements

Got something to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: