Maybe they took my advice (LOL!) and stepped aside. Well done ILT! I, for one, have a better opinion of you.
I am confused by this statement though
The ILT is a commercial organisation and must support its business brand at every opportunity. However, in this case we think the size of Mr Crimp’s donation to the community outweighs our needs
I assumed it was the same setup as gambling venues, in that there are two entities and never the twain shall meet. I consider them as two groups, ILT (commercial organisation) and ILT Foundation (charity). I haven’t looked into it and I don’t have the time or energy at the moment.
Silly me, I assumed ILT ran the business that held enough funds to ensure the long term viability and expansion of the business and paid a dividend or portion to the Foundation. Even as I type this though I am wondering if the ILT Foundation is the Gambling Act required charity for the gambling machine profits to go to and not anything to do with the alcohol related part of ILT.
Don’t have time to look it up right now. Hopefully someone can enlighten me.
